skip to main |
skip to sidebar
BackgroundThe
“Apocalypse of John”, or “Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ” is
believed to have been written approximately 93 AD on the Isle of Patmos,
small island in the Aegean Sea. While scholars agree that John wrote
the book, they disagree on which John wrote it. Many scholars today
believe that there were three Johns, one who wrote the Gospel, one the
Epistles, and John of Patmos writing the Revelation.Many
early scholars believed the apostle John wrote the Apocalypse, but by
the time of St Jerome (ca 400 AD) he relegated the book to “second
class”. He doubted the apostle had written it, and almost rejected it
when putting together the books we now know as the Bible. He was
concerned with its apocalyptic nature, as being outside what he
considered to be the norm for authoritative books. Only its popularity
among the members of the western Church caused him to add it to the
Bible, in order to have his list become the authoritative list of
scripture.The
term “Apocalypse” had a different meaning than most understand it now.
While modern readers often think of great destruction and the end of
the world when they read the word, “apocalypse” actually means an
unveiling or revealing of God and his secrets. John’s Revelation is the
only major apocalypse in the New Testament, however it fits in well
with many others found among the Jews and Christians of the time period.
Jude does quote from the apocalyptic 1st Enoch (see below) as a
shorter example of apocalypse in the New Testament.John’s Apocalypse - a Temple EndowmentMany
Christians focus on the the Revelation’s teachings on the end times,
the destruction of the world, and attempt to determine just when
Armageddon will occur. In doing so, they miss the more important
concept taught in the Revelation: it is an ancient endowment.The
ancient endowment, as well as the modern LDS endowment, is a symbolic
revelation of man’s return into the presence of God. For Latter-day
Saints, the endowment consists of instruction regarding the Creation,
the Fall of Adam (and mankind), our struggle with mortality outside of
God’s presence, and our final return to God’s presence through the
atonement of Christ.Other
ancient texts, such as Enoch, the Ascension of Isaiah, the Apocalypse
of Paul, and Lehi’s Apocalypse in the Book of Mormon also bring out the
theme of returning to the presence of God from a fallen world. We can
see that there are similarities in these Ascension texts.Kings and PriestsJohn
is told that the revelation is directed primarily to the seven churches
in Asia: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamos, Thyatira, Sardos, Philadelphia and
Laodicea. The Lord tells the saints in those cities,
“Jesus
Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the
dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us,
and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen” (Rev 1:5-6, KJV).
Other
Bible translations differ on the reading here in verse 6, often stating
that Christ made us “a kingdom of priests unto God, his Father”. Both
translations are found in ancient manuscripts. Interestingly,
the KJV translation suggests interesting relationships between man and
God. Through his atoning blood, Jesus has made us “kings and priests”
to God and God’s father. Whether this should be interpreted as Jesus
and his Father, or God the Father and a father of God himself, I’ll
leave up to the reader. Potentially, any such reading is valid and
perhaps should be considered in light of the early Christian view that
Jesus and God were separate beings, and that there were other divine
beings as well.That
mankind may become “kings and priests” and not just a “kingdom of
priests” as other translations state, is inherent in the book’s concept
that others will receive thrones and reign with God.To Him that Overcometh...The
Lord gives to John a series of promises and warnings to the seven
churches. The warnings range from wealth, to sexual sin, to apostates,
to being lukewarm in testimony. The
promises are very familiar to temple-going Latter-day Saints, and were
understood by ancient Christians seeking to return to the presence of
God.
“He
that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches;
To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is
in the midst of the paradise of God” (Rev 2:7).
The
Tree of Life is a powerful symbol of the ancient and modern temple.
Prior to the destruction of Solomon’s Temple, it had a Tree growing
within it, symbolizing Life, fertility, and Wisdom. According to Nephi
in his Vision, the Tree of Life symbolized the Mother of God, who bore
the precious fruit of Jesus Christ (1 Nephi 11:9-25).
OT scholar and Methodist minister, Margaret Barker, noted that such a
vision of the Mother of God being represented by the Tree of Life fits
perfectly in with the motif in Solomon’s Temple.Adam
was forbidden to partake of the fruit of the Tree of Life, because his
transgression caused a separation between him and God. For him to eat
its fruit while under condemnation would have brought about an instant
judgment, and he would have stayed forever out of God’s presence. With
the atonement of Christ, we now are invited to partake of the fruit,
once we show faith and repent of our sins. Christ’s blood justifies us,
so we are guiltless and ready to partake of the fruit of the Tree of
Life both symbolically today and someday in a literal sense.
“...be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the
churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death” (Rev
2:10-11).
As
mentioned before, if we are faithful, Christ will make us “kings and
priests”, where we will receive a crown. Crown signifies a coronation
and enthronement as a king or prince. Those that overcome in this
instance are those unharmed by the second death. When we exercise faith
and repent, again Christ makes us guiltless of any sins. We are no
longer under the condemnation. We are no longer under Satan’s grasp and
power. We shall be found in the Book of Life, even though we may still
be judged for our works from the other books presented (Rev 20:12-15). These other books will determine the reward we gain in heaven.
“He
that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches;
To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will
give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no
man knoweth saving he that receiveth it” (Rev 2:17).
For
most Christians, this passage means little or nothing. Through Joseph
Smith, however, much has been revealed regarding the white stone and its
significance. In Doctrine and Covenants 130, we first read about the
Urim and Thummim (Hebrew: Lights and Perfections). It was an ancient
device of divination used the the chief priest of the temple. Through
it, the priest received revelation from God. In LDS history, various
forms of Urim and Thummim have been described, including God’s heaven
and a stone.
“The place where God resides is a great Urim and Thummim.
This earth, in its sanctified and immortal state, will be made like
unto crystal and will be a Urim and Thummim to the inhabitants who dwell
thereon, whereby all things pertaining to an inferior kingdom, or all
kingdoms of a lower order, will be manifest to those who dwell on it;
and this earth will be Christ’s.
Then the white stone mentioned in Revelation 2:17, will become a Urim
and Thummim to each individual who receives one, whereby things
pertaining to a higher order of kingdoms will be made known;
And a white stone is given to each of those who come into the celestial
kingdom, whereon is a new name written, which no man knoweth save he
that receiveth it. The new name is the key word” (D&C 130:8-11).
This
earth, once it is changed for the Lord’s coming in glory, will be like a
Urim and Thummim that teaches us about the lower things in the
universe. Each holy person will receive a personal Urim and Thummim, a
white stone, through which all things may be revealed. The new name is a
“key word” for accessing the information in the white stone. The Book
of Mormon also tells us that whoever looks into the Urim and Thummim
must be careful on what he looks for, so he does not look for things he
shouldn’t and perish (Mosiah 8:13-20).
Also known as “Interpreters” for their ability to translate ancient
documents, we are told that the Urim and Thummim can also reveal the
darkest secrets of evil men and bring them to light (Alma 37:23-25).Given
all this detailed description, it seems that in the 1830s, Joseph Smith
described and used in his receiving many revelations, the first
Celestial-Internet-connected miniature computer. The new or key word is
what we today would call a password. Just as with the Internet today,
we need to be cautious of what we look for, so we do not see evil things
that can destroy us, or cause us to perish spiritually.
“And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter
shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
And I will give him the morning star.
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches” (Rev 2:26-29).
Such
individuals, again, will be rulers and kings. They will have power
over the nations, even as Enoch of old had power over the enemies of
Zion (Moses 7).
In the ascension story in 3 Enoch, the prophet is given the title of
Metatron the archangel. He is clothed in white, and placed upon the
throne of God, where the angels and other divine beings worship him!
While he is still subservient to God, God shares his throne with him.
Jesus shall also share his power with each of us. The “morning star”
(Venus) is a symbol for both Messiah and Satan in ancient Jewish
writing. We shall have power over Satan, and power given us by Christ,
even as Christ “received of my Father.”
“Thou
hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments;
and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy.
He
that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will
not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his
name before my Father, and before his angels.
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches” (Rev 3:4-6).
Here
we see that the righteous will be dressed in white clothing. In the
Ascension of isaiah, the book of Enoch, and in the LDS endowment, we
also see that the righteous are clothed in white. In the ascension texts
(which Revelation is one), the initiate goes through the levels of
heaven to the highest, wherein he receives a new garment, clothing of
white. For John, one way to view the openings of the seals is to see
different views of not only the future, but of entering new realms of
heaven and earth, ending in the final triumph of the righteous and their
return to the presence of God in white raiment (see Rev 4:4).
“Him
that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he
shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and
the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh
down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches” (Rev 3:12-13).
Here
we see a direct connection to the temple of the Lord. Solomon’s temple
had two 27 foot tall bronze pillars at its entrance, named Boaz and
Jachin (2 Chron 3:17).
Boaz means “might” or “splendor” and Jachin means “established”. So
together, they represent the concept that in God’s might, he will
establish himself. Here we are given the name of God and his holy city
as our own. We become family members, or fellow citizens with the saints
of God (Ephesians 2:19).The
pillars also symbolize the point wherein man must prepare to enter into
God’s presence. John will see such an entrance in his vision, as a
“door was opened in heaven” (Rev 4:1),
where he hears the voice from inside, calling for him to enter. In the
Apocalypse of Paul, as he travels upward through the levels of heaven,
he is stopped by a sentinel or gatekeeper (where the entrance pillars
would be), who demands answers from him. Paul’s guide, the Holy Ghost as
a child, tells him to share the token he has, on which the sentinel
then allows him to pass. It may be that some portions of the ancient
temple were guarded by tokens, including a new name or password that
allowed entrance.God
also has a new name. One can say that God’s old name was Jehovah, and
is now Jesus Christ. In covenants, many Christians (including LDS) take
upon ourselves the name of Christ through baptism and the holy supper.
“To
him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I
also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches” (Rev 3:21-22).
Here
we find the final promise of the temple and of the ascension texts. The
initiate receives a fullness of God’s blessings through Christ. The
individual who has overcome all things through Christ, will now sit down
with Christ on a throne. Paul explains this in many ways:
“Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God” (Phil 2:5-6, note the KJV is different than other Bible versions, but also seems clearer in its meaning)
“The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:
And
if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if
so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together” (Romans 8:16-17).
John’s Vision of the Throne, the book, etc.In
Revelation 4, as mentioned previously, “a door was opened in heaven”
and John is called (probably by the sentinel) to enter in. Once inside,
he stood before the throne of God. He has returned into the presence of
the Lord. Surrounding
the Lord’s throne are 24 other thrones, where other divine beings sit
in judgment. Here we find that John recognizes that God is not the only
divine being, but is the only one we worship. He’ll will learn this
again later in his book, as an angel representing Christ shows him
marvelous things. John prostrates himself before the angel to worship
him, but is rebuked.
“And
I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it
not: I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren that have the
testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the
spirit of prophecy” (Rev 19:10).
Here we find that John thought the divine being was worthy of worship.
The angel, however, noted that we only worship God in Christ, as he is
a fellow servant. This also suggests to us that angels and men are
related.These
24 divine beings wear the white raiment spoken of, sit on thrones, yet
still prostrate themselves to the one God. Having such an experience of
seeing God on his throne is called a theophany.John’s
experience is similar to those of Isaiah (Ascension of isaiah) and of
Lehi (Book of Mormon). All three see God on his throne. Each will be
given a book. John will swallow his book and learn of his future
mission, while the others will read the books given them, and will
prophesy. John will see many things regarding Christ, both his mortal
and future roles. Isaiah and Lehi, who preceded Jesus, would see the
Lord descend from heaven. In the Vision of the Tree of Life, both Lehi
and his son, Nephi, would see the life of the mortal Christ. Isaiah
would also foresaw Christ’s birth:
“For
unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government
shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful,
Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace”
(Isa 9:6).
John
would foresee the Second Coming of Christ in glory, wherein the
righteous on earth will be brought back into the presence of God. More
on this in the next and final New Testament lesson.ConclusionHerein
is the true power and importance of John’s revelation. While the views
of the end of times may be interesting to speculate about, the key is
John reveals to us about the ascension to God’s presence.Bibliography Some Other Apocalypses among the Jews and early ChristiansAscension of Isaiah: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/ascension.htmlApocalypse of Paul: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/ascp.htmlApocalypse of Peter: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/apocalypsepeter-mrjames.html1st Book of Enoch: http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/2nd or Secret Book of Enoch: http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/fbe/index.htm#section_0023d Book of Enoch: http://www.scribd.com/doc/2024701/Hebrew-book-of-3-EnochLehi’s Apocalypse in the Book of Mormon: 1 Nephi 1:4-15 (compare with Ascension of Isaiah)Michael Heiser (Academic Editor, Logos Bible Software) interview, regarding the name Elohim and many Gods: http://www.dburnett.com/?p=1322Nicolaism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NicolaismMargaret Barker, 2005 Joseph Smith Symposium at Library of Congress (session 2):http://oneclimbs.com/2016/03/30/margaret-barker-transcript-from-the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference/
The Epistles of John
The Epistles of John are believed to have been written around 100-110 AD by John the Apostle.
Fighting the Heretic Gnostics
In this time period of early Christianity, the church was fighting various factions that taught different teachings regarding Christ. Perhaps one of the most challenging groups of heretics would be the Gnostics. The term Gnostic comes from the word “gnosis” which means a hidden knowledge or secret. There were several different groups of Gnostics, each with varying beliefs. However, most had some concepts in common. First, they believed they held secret knowledge from the apostles or through revelation that extended the gospel to another level. Many would attend regular Christian meetings, but then also have their own meetings, where they believed the higher knowledge was taught. For a time, some versions of Gnosticism dominated certain areas of the Christian world, and even threatened to overtake what is called the “proto-Orthodox” Christian Church.
Heresy #1, good Jehovah and bad Elohim
1 John begins by telling us, “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all” (1:5). Many of the Gnostics believed that the Garden of Eden story was about a god that created mankind in order to mess with them. This god, Elohim, did not want to bless mankind, but to toy with them. Meanwhile, the god Yahweh/Jehovah sought to save the people from the cruelty of the god Elohim.
John was teaching that God Elohim was and is a God of light, and not an evil god. The apostle then explained that we are to follow God and Jesus in the light. The Gnostic concept is that man was sinless, because it was God that caused the Fall, not man. However, we read, “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (1:8). Gnostics blamed sin on Elohim, and hoped for salvation through Yahweh. Yet, John teaches that we are responsible for our own separation from God, through our own sins.
Early Christians saw that Jesus was the Messiah, or the mortal Yahweh. He is the Son of God and the Angel of God’s Presence (Shekinah). There was no battle going on between Elohim (God the Father) and Yahweh (God the Son). John emphasizes this concept:
“Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: [but] he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also” (2:22-23).
Connected to the concept of “God is Light” is that we must also seek the light, and reject the darkness. This includes the concept that hatred equals darkness.
“He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now. He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes” (2:9-11).
Heresy #2 - Christ as Spirit, Jesus as Man
Among the key heretic issues taught by many Gnostic sects was a belief in the docetic (dual) nature of Jesus:
1. They believed that the man Jesus and the God Christ were separate individuals. When Jesus was baptized, the God Christ entered into him (the dove descending), and God the Father spoke saying, “Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee....I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son” (Hebrews 1:5). They did not think that Jesus the man was born the Son of God, but was begotten at baptism through a spiritual rebirth, when the God Christ entered into Jesus and became a part of him through mortality.
2. Christ did not suffer, Only Jesus did. The Christ did the miracles and taught the people. But the man Jesus went through the suffering. Upon the cross, “... about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Matt 27:46, Psalms 22:1). In other words, prior to the suffering, the God Christ left Jesus to suffer and die alone.
3. The man Jesus was rewarded for his sacrifice by being the first to resurrect. The God Christ, however, continued as a Spirit, never having been born , suffered, nor died as a mortal.
On this topic, John warns us about the danger of such a heresy:
“Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world” (4:2-3).
As we can see from the Gnostic belief of a separate Jesus and Christ, they did not believe that Christ came in the flesh. Here, John intentionally uses the full name Jesus Christ, to show that Jesus the man and Christ the god are both the same being. Jesus is god and man, Christ is god and man. Jesus = Christ.
And this is a sign of an anti-Christ (not necessarily THE Anti-Christ of the last days), which was in the Christian world in 100AD. The Gnostics believed Christ continued as a spirit, never suffering nor truly interacting with mankind directly, but indirectly through Jesus the man. For the Gnostics, Christ never resurrected in the flesh, and never will have a resurrected body.
Today, we can partially judge a Christian Church by determining whether it believe Jesus came in the flesh (mortality), died on the cross, and resurrected. Resurrection means he forever retains his physical body, just as he retains his spirit. Resurrected Jesus is God.
Modern heresy of the Athanasius creed
The current concept of the Trinity came about through two councils: the Council of Nicea and the Council of Chalcedon, both done in the 4th century AD. Prior to this time, many Christians believed that Christ came in the flesh and resurrected. They believed that God the Father and God the Son were two separate beings. For example, the early Christian defender Origen taught that Jesus was a God subordinate to the Father.
However, from the end of the second century to the fourth century AD, more and more Christian leaders embraced Hellenistic (Greek) philosophy and embedded several such concepts into Christian belief. Among these was the concept that there is only one God and he is of a pure substance (Spirit) that is completely different than any other substance. Bishop Athanasius pushed for a new creed or belief that would designate the Father, Son and Holy Ghost as only one Spirit with three persons. Other bishops, such as Arius and the historian Eusebius disagreed, but lost when Constantine (not yet baptized as a Christian) accepted Athanasius’ creed and established it as the Nicene Creed. Constantine sent many “heretic” Christians, who did not accept the Trinity, to the copper mines, which essentially was a death sentence.
It would still take over a century for the Nicene Creed to become Christian doctrine, as it almost lost out again in the 4th century. Still, the Nicene Creed left many questions. How could Christ be spirit and still have a physical body? At the end of the 4th Century, the Council of Chalcedon began and determined the duality of Christ. Today, most Christian religions embrace the two creeds as doctrine, even though the Bible is rather silent on such issues.
In fact, early Christans intentionally changed First John to reflect the Trinity in it. 1 John 5:7-8 tells us:
“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.”
This clearly sounds like evidence of the Trinity creed. However, scholars now call this the “Comma Johanneum”, or Johannine Comma or Clause. The portion that was the later addition is: “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth”.
Without the clause, the verse originally stated, “For there are three that bear record, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.”
The clause does not appear in any texts prior to the ninth century AD. Such an effort to intentionally change the feel and thought of First John goes entirely against his teaching in the epistle! He stated that Christ resurrected and had a body, while also being the Son of God. Historically, the comment was added in a later Bible version called the Textus Receptus, which was used in all Bible translations from 1522 onward until the past century. Yes, it is even in the King James Bible, which is one reason why LDS believe the Bible to be correct and the word of God insofar as it is translated correctly (Article of Faith 8).
Jesus taught that “God is a Spirit” (John 4:24), which is often used as evidence of the Trinity. However, here John teaches that “God is love” (1 John 4:8). God as spirit and love show attributes of God, not a specific statement that God is only one thing. God can be a spirit, love, resurrected being with a physical body, and many other things. To define him only as a spirit is to delimit him and our understanding of whom he really is.
What we do know, John teaches us:
“Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he (God) is pure” (1 John 3:2-3).
Background on JudeScholars
differ on which Jude is the author of this epistle: whether it is the
apostle Jude, the brother of Jesus, or if they are the same individual.
All agree that Judas Iscariot is not the author of the epistle. The
epistle was controversial in the early days of Christianity. All early
Christian leaders believed in its authenticity, but argued over whether
to include it in the canon of scripture, because of controversial
concepts contained within it, including its quoting or referencing of
non-canonical writings. Origen discusses the early controversy over the
epistle of Jude by some church leaders, though he personally accepted
it. The controversy continued into the 4th century, as noted by
Eusebius of Caesarea in his Ecclesiastical History.The
epistle was not directed towards any particular Christian congregation,
but was written to be distributed throughout all the churches of
Christ. Jude’s few verses are very similar to that found in 2 Peter
(mostly chapter 2). Scholars believe that either there was a previous
source both used, or that one was the source for the other.Keeping your First EstateJude
begins his epistle discussing the importance of contending for the
faith, and fighting against apostates who seek to turn believers from
following Christ and his gospel.
“
5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this,
how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt,
afterward destroyed them that believed not.
6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own
habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto
the judgment of the great day.
7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner,
giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh,
are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire”
(Jude).
Israel
in Egypt is compared with the premortal existence. From Egypt, Israel
was offered a fresh start, a freedom, as they moved to the Promised
Land. Yet, many fought with Moses, thinking they knew better. In doing
so, they were destroyed.So
it was in the premortal existence. We were spirit children of God in
the prior life. Yet, as only spirits, we were limited to our growth,
agency, and free will. To move forward, we required a fresh start in
mortality, with the expectation that we would believe in Christ and
follow God through his appointed prophets. In Abraham 3, we read about this premortal experience:
“
22 Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were
organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of
the noble and great ones;
23 And God saw these souls that they were good, and he stood in the
midst of them, and he said: These I will make my rulers; for he stood
among those that were spirits, and he saw that they were good; and he
said unto me: Abraham, thou art one of them; thou wast chosen before
thou wast born.
24 And there stood one among them that was like unto God, and he said
unto those who were with him: We will go down, for there is space there,
and we will take of these materials, and we will make an earth whereon
these may dwell;
25 And we will prove them herewith, to see if they will do all things whatsoever the Lord their God shall command them;
26 And they who keep their first estate shall be added upon; and they
who keep not their first estate shall not have glory in the same kingdom
with those who keep their first estate; and they who keep their second
estate shall have glory added upon their heads for ever and ever.
27 And the Lord said: Whom shall I send? And one answered like unto the
Son of Man: Here am I, send me. And another answered and said: Here am
I, send me. And the Lord said: I will send the first.
28 And the second was angry, and kept not his first estate; and, at that day, many followed after him” (Book of Abraham 3).
Here
we see that some chose to rebel, rather than follow the plan God set
forth. Lucifer and many others rejected their first estate, or the
experiences of the premortal life. Instead of coming down to gain a
body and have a chance at choosing eternal life through Christ, they
rejected everything and were cast down from heaven, becoming Satan and
his demons. As Jude notes, these are they who rejected their first
estate and are to be enchained in Outer Darkness in the final day of
judgment. So
will it be for those who indulge in fornications and sexual pleasures
that do not fall under the mandate of God. Sodom and Gomorrah is noted
as a place that was destroyed for its sinfulness. Professor Harold
Bloom wrote that Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed for its sinful
sexual behaviors (including homosexual and heterosexual acts), but for
the inhabitants not being hospitable. In other words, God put up with
their sinful natures until they attempted to impose that lifestyle upon
others (such as on Lot and his angelic visitors). Jude warns us that such sinful nature is the cause for destruction for a people.Body of MosesOne of the two very controversial portions of the Epistle of Jude is the story regarding Moses’ body.
“9
Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing
accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.”
Here,
the greatest of the angels, Michael, contends with Satan for the body
of Moses. Origen noted that this was a part of an ancient Jewish text
entitled the “Assumption of Moses” (also known as the Testament of
Moses), believed by modern scholars to have been written in the 1st
century AD. The Assumption of Moses that is now available no longer
contains this story, but is believed by many to have been at the end in
the original. This is part of the controversy that arises with Jude’s
epistle. He is actually quoting from a non-canonical source!The
concept comes forth that rather than dying, Moses is to ascend to
heaven, even as Enoch or Elijah did. In Jude, Michael must fight for
Moses that he may ascend in a translated or raptured state, rather than
die.Enoch’s Prophecy
“14
And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying,
Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly
among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed,
and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken
against him.”
Again,
Jude quotes from another non-canonical source. This time, it is from
one of the various surviving books of Enoch. The writings of Enoch were
well accepted by many Jews and Christians from the 2nd century BC and
until St Jerome rejected it for his compilation of the Bible. Enoch is
quoted or referenced dozens of times in the New Testament, with Jude as
the most well known. Fragments
of Enoch writings are found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, suggesting that
the ancient Essenes accepted Enoch as scripture. Interestingly, the
fragments within the Dead Sea Scrolls are only one of two places wherein
we find a person named Mahujah/Mahijah who questions Enoch. The other
known writing of Enoch that has this encounter is found in Joseph
Smith’s translation of the Book of Moses (Moses 6:40)!Jude’s
connection between Moses and Enoch is an important one. Both are called
of God to be an important prophet in their days. Both have a heavenly
vision and then are sent back to earth with the commandments and
teachings of God. Both foresaw the coming of the Lord in glory and
power among men. In LDS belief, Enoch prepared his city of Zion to be
lifted to heaven, while Moses tried to bring the children of Israel into
the presence of God at Sinai, and then into the Promised Land. Enoch
saved his people from the evil that occurred before the Flood, while
Moses saved his people from the evils in Egypt.
There
is another place, besides Jude, where both prophets are discussed and
offered as symbols of the coming Lord Jesus Christ. Joseph Smith
received a revelation while studying the Bible regarding the Creation,
the Fall of Man, and the times of Enoch before the Flood. All of this
Joseph received through the eyes of the prophet Moses.As
with Enoch, Joseph Smith also proclaimed that the Lord would return for
his Second Coming in great power and glory. Our job is to keep the
commandments, be chaste, virtuous, and righteous in following Christ. In
doing so, the day may come when the archangel Michael may contend with
the devil over us, that we may gain our second estate and receive a
crown of glory.
Bibliography
Nag Hammadi Library (Primarily Gnostic writings found at Nag Hammadi, Egypt):
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html
First Peter - wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John
“Condemned to the Mines, Copper Production and Christian Persecution”, Biblical Archaeological Review, Nov/Dec 2011, pg 30: http://www.bib-arch.org/bar/article.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=37&Issue=6&ArticleID=2
Comma Johanneum - wikepedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma_Johanneum
Epistle of Jude - wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_of_Jude
Epistle of Jude - Catholic Encyclopedia: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08542b.htm
Epistle of Jude - Early Christian Writings: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/jude.html
Inhospitality of Sodom - http://joelsmonastery.blogspot.com/2010/02/lds-gospel-doctrine-class-old-testament_15.html
Lack of Hospitality by Sodom - Book of J, Harold Bloom, pp 299-301: http://www.amazon.com/Book-J-Harold-Bloom/dp/0802141919/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1320158037&sr=8-1
Assumption of Moses - wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption_of_Moses
Assumption of Moses (AKA Testament of Moses): http://www.piney.com/Testament-Moses.html
Book of Enoch (as quoted by Jude): http://www.piney.com/ApocEnoch1.html
Mahijah/Mahujah: http://joelsmonastery.blogspot.com/2010/01/gospel-doctrine-old-testament-lesson-5.html
Book of Moses: http://lds.org/scriptures/pgp/moses?lang=eng